GPS and Track
vs. Azuga Fleet

One Purchase vs. A 36-Month Commitment

Fleet tracking shoppers eventually notice that most established platforms are built around a signed, multi-year agreement, while a smaller set of direct providers sell the hardware and service once and step back. Azuga Fleet sits squarely in the first group. GPS and Track sits in the second. Here’s an honest side-by-side of what each actually costs and delivers.

How Azuga Fleet Prices Its Service

Azuga publishes starting prices on its site, which puts it ahead of several competitors on transparency, though a full quote still requires submitting fleet details through an online form. Based on that published pricing and independent reviews, here’s the general shape of it:

  • Tiered monthly rate: the BasicFleet plan starts around $25 per vehicle/month, SafeFleet runs about $30/month, and CompleteFleet lands near $35/month. Dash-cam add-ons push the cost to roughly $49.99 per vehicle, per month on top of whichever base tier is chosen.
  • Fleet-size scaling: a 10-vehicle fleet commonly runs $200–$400 per month, and a 100-vehicle fleet can land in the $1,500–$3,500-per-month range.
  • Contract length: a 36-month commitment applies to most plans, and is effectively required for any package that includes a dash cam.
  • Hardware: devices are plug-and-play, but a notable share of user reviews flag hardware reliability as a recurring frustration, with replacement units reportedly slow to arrive.

Run the math on a 10-vehicle fleet at the CompleteFleet rate of $35/vehicle/month: that’s $350 a month, or roughly $12,600 across the standard 3-year term — before any dash-cam upgrade or additional asset-tracking features are added.

How GPS and Track Prices Its Service

GPS and Track replaces all of that with a single payment, with no tiered monthly plan, no 36-month commitment, and no dash-cam upcharge required to unlock a longer contract. When a vehicle leaves the fleet, the tracker simply stops being used. There’s no remaining balance on a multi-year agreement and no add-on that quietly extends the term further.

The gap widens the longer the vehicle stays in service. A tiered subscription bills every month for the life of the contract, and stepping up to a higher tier often locks in that same multi-year commitment all over again. A one-time purchase caps the total at a single number up front, with nothing further owed unless renewal is chosen. Stretched across 2–3 years, a flat charge paid once comes in well below a recurring per-vehicle rate tied to a three-year term.

That advantage holds at scale as well. GPS and Track’s per-unit pricing improves with volume, so a larger fleet pays less per vehicle without needing to commit to a longer contract or a higher-priced tier to access that rate. A fleet scaling from a handful of vehicles into the hundreds keeps the same simple, published pricing throughout — just at a better per-unit cost as the order grows.

Support Is Worth Weighing Directly

This is one area where the difference is especially clear-cut. Independent review aggregators report that a striking share of Azuga users single out customer assistance as a weak point, describing support as slow to respond and inconsistent in following up — alongside frequent complaints about faulty hardware taking a while to get replaced. GPS and Track’s team, by contrast, stays directly involved with customers regardless of fleet size, which matters most in exactly the moments — a malfunctioning device, an urgent question — where slow support does the most damage.


The Bottom Line

For a fleet that wants predictable costs and reliable support without a 36-month tether, the numbers tend to favor GPS and Track — one flat purchase instead of a tiered monthly plan, no dash-cam upcharge tied to a longer contract, and a support team that stays consistently hands-on where independent reviews suggest Azuga often falls short. Over a 2–3 year window, skipping the recurring subscription and long-term commitment that comes standard with Azuga Fleet adds up to a meaningfully lower — and more dependable — total cost.